Swedish house price trends

After years of buoyant growth, Swedish residential price growth turned negative in the second half of 2017. 

8th May 2018

Continue to the other two articles in this edition of Global Outlook.....

Outlook remains positive despite risks of trade war


Louis Wright explores why, despite increased financial market volatility and downside risks from heightened global trade tensions, the global economy continues to improve.

Click here to read more


Q&A - US and Canadian housing markets


Brian Biggs discusses the current state of the US and Canada’s residential property market a decade on from the Global Financial Crisis.

Read more here

After years of buoyant growth, Swedish residential price growth turned negative in the second half of 2017. While not unexpected, this shift occurred earlier than anticipated and sparked a wide reaching debate about the outlook for the residential market as well as wider consequences for the Swedish economy.

In this article, we discuss the drivers of residential prices in Sweden, contextualising them within the house price bubble of the late 1980s, and formulate the outlook. In our view, the correction was due as the market was close to overheating, but the preceding price growth was to a large extent fundamentally justified. While it may result in some weakening of confidence in the short term, longer term negative consequences for the economy are unlikely given the fundamental strength of the economy and a very solid financial standing of the consumers.

Historical perspective
Swedish residential prices have been growing with only few interruptions since late 1990s. The only two instances of declines were during the financial crisis in 2008 and in the aftermath of the European sovereign debt crisis in 2011 and growth accelerated again after 2013. In total, residential prices were growing on average by 6.5% p.a. between 1995 and 2017 in the whole of Sweden and by 7.7% p.a. in Stockholm, and growth rates were even higher in the past five years at 7.8% p.a. and 8.7% p.a., respectively. Due to low inflation during most of this period, real growth rates were also very high.

Buoyant house price growth raised concerns about potential overheating of the market and formation of a house price bubble, particularly in the context of increasing mortgage debt. A series of warnings from the Riksbank and various international institutions, including the European Commission, culminated in regulatory measures aimed at cooling the market, in particular the limitation of interest-only loans. At the same time, construction activity started to increase rapidly from 2015 onwards after 20 years of very low levels. These developments finally led to a reversion of the price trend that became evident in autumn 2017. According to the Valueguard’s HOX index, residential prices in Sweden declined 9% between August and December 2017, while the drop was even higher for flats in Stockholm at minus 12%. However, the first months of 2018 have seen a counter-movement and the index regained 3% until March 2018. The shift was also accompanied by a slow-down in transaction activity, which dropped in the second half of 2017 to the lowest level in years and continued to be muted in the first months of 2018.


Drivers of residential prices
Low interest rates and the availability of cheap mortgages have been most frequently named as the key drivers of residential price increases in many European cities over the past decade. However, we believe that the reasons were much more fundamental in Sweden. Reviewing the key demand and supply factors, it is evident that Sweden has seen a significant increase in population since 2006, driven mainly by migration but more recently by natural growth. At the same time, construction of residential units remained at historically low levels. In fact, population growth has been higher than the growth of residential stock for more than 10 years leading to an effective shortage of housing. 255 out of Sweden’s 290 municipalities reported housing shortages in the 2017 survey conducted by the National Board of Housing, Building and Planning (Boverket). Another analysis by Riksbank indicated that shortages are most severe in metropolitan areas, in particular in Stockholm.





The upwards pressure on house prices arising from the above fundamental factors was further boosted by favourable lending conditions. Debt-to income ratios of Swedish households doubled from c.90% in 1995 to c.180% in 2016, but the interest coverage ratio (interest payment as a percentage of disposable income) dropped from over 10% to 4% during the same period. At the same time, household savings increased to historically high levels from around 5% to over 10% of GDP, and the savings rate has been consistently among the highest in Europe over the several past decades.

The relatively sudden trend reversion in 2017 can be attributed to three factors:

  • Rapid increase in supply,
  • Changes in regulations to limit mortgage lending,
  • Wide spread expectation of an imminent market turn, reflected in the rhetoric of major institutions.

Comparison with the 1980s
Economic commentators frequently compare the current situation with the house price bubble of the late 1980s, which eventually led to a severe financial crisis. Rapid deregulation of the lending market in a high inflation and low real interest rate environment led to an uncontrolled increase in mortgage debt levels and resulted in a pricing bubble on the real estate market. It was punctured by the restructuring of the tax system and an interest rate increase by the Riksbank in an attempt to protect the currency value. As a consequence, Sweden experienced a deep financial crisis and an economic downturn.



The profiles of house prices and household indebtedness in the last five years indeed resemble those in the years 1986-1990. However, there are also a number of significant differences that should be considered:

  • The balance of supply and demand is entirely different today than it was 30 years ago. New construction was reaching record levels in the late 80s, only a decade after significant amounts of housing stock were added during the “Million Programme” of the 1960s and 70s. In contrast, current supply is much tighter, especially when compared with such strong population growth.
  • The financial situation of households was more stretched in the late 80s and early 90s.  Despite the lower debt levels, interest expenditures exceeded 15% of household incomes compared with 4% today. Also, the current high level of household savings provides a buffer against adverse mortgage market developments.
  • The economic growth of Sweden during the late 80s was comparable with today’s levels, but it was below the average for developed countries at the time. In contrast, Sweden has been a clear outperformer in the recent years and business confidence remains strong.
  • Finally, the central bank and Swedish authorities appear to be more concerned about the risks associated with the potential bubble, taking active steps to counter market overheating. Interest rates increases are therefore likely to be gradual and communicated well in advance.

While the lessons learned from the 1980s boom and the 1990s downturn remain relevant, the risks arising from the recent correction on the housing market appear to be smaller than 30 years ago.

Outlook and consequences for other sectors
Going forward, we might see some further declines of Swedish house prices during 2018 driven by more restrictive mortgage regulation, increasing completions and some negative momentum. However, we believe that most of the correction has already fed through, and growth will return in 2020. In the medium term, strong economic fundamentals and continued population growth should support a rebound in prices. The price correction should also slow down supply, which will additionally support future recovery.

As outlined above, we believe that despite some similarities, the current market situation is fundamentally different from the boom and recession of the late 80s and early 90s. Hence, significant consequences for the broader economy are not likely. In fact, Swedish GDP growth in the final quarter of 2017 was 0.9%, resulting in an annual increase of 3.3%. The forecast for 2018 is only slightly weaker at 2.6% and business confidence remains very strong and so far unaffected. However, consumer confidence has been trending downwards in the first months of 2018 according to OECD, albeit still above the long term average. In the context of high household debt, declining house prices might result in weaker consumption in the near term, but also this effect should be temporary.



View all Grosvenor contacts


Use of this Grosvenor Fund Management Limited (“GFM”) section of the grosvenor.com website (the “GFM Website”) is subject to the following terms and legal notices (“Conditions”).  You are being asked to agree to these Conditions because:  (a) you are accessing the GFM Website for the first time or (b) you are accessing the GFM Website from a different section of the grosvenor.com website. 

The information in the GFM Website was prepared by GFM only for, and is directed only at, the limited categories of persons described under “LEGAL NOTICES” below.  The information in this GFM Website is not intended for the use of and should not be relied on by any other person.

GFM is registered in England, with Company Number 04056191 and its registered office at 70 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JP.

This GFM Website contains general information about GFM and related entities and is intended for informational purposes only. The information contained on this GFM Website is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase interests in any fund managed by GFM or a related entity, nor  is it intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, investment, tax, legal or financial advice.  Investors should seek applicable professional advice for their particular situation.  The information contained herein is a summary only, is not complete, and does not include certain material information, including potential conflicts of interest and risks associated with an investment with GFM and its related entities.

No representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the enclosed materials, including hyperlinks or references to other sites, by GFM or its related entities, and no liability is accepted by such persons for the accuracy or completeness of any such information or opinions, to the fullest extent permissible by applicable law.  Users are responsible for evaluating the adequacy, accuracy, reliability, merchantability, non-infringement, and/or completeness of any information or the content available on this GFM Website or fitness for any particular purpose with respect to this GFM Website or any of its content.  The estimates, strategies, and views expressed herein are based upon past or current market conditions and/or data and information provided by unaffiliated third parties (which has not been independently verified) and is subject to change without notice. An investment with GFM is speculative and contains significant risks, including the risk of loss of some or all of an investment, and is intended only for sophisticated investors who meet certain eligibility criteria.  Such investments are not deposits or obligations of, or guaranteed or endorsed by, any bank and are not insured or guaranteed by any government or any other agency.


Information displayed on this GFM Website may contain material that is interpreted as a financial promotion for purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom (the “FSMA”).  GFM is not an authorised person for purposes of the FSMA, and accordingly, the communication of information on this GFM Website is provided only for and is directed only at persons in the UK reasonably believed to be of a kind to whom such promotions may be communicated by an unauthorised person pursuant to an exemption under the FSMA (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”).  Such persons include: (a) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments (“Investment Professionals”) and (b) high net worth bodies corporate, partnerships, unincorporated associations, trusts, etc. falling within Article 49 of the FPO (“High Net Worth Businesses”). High Net Worth Businesses include: (i) a corporation which has called-up share capital or net assets of at least £5 million or is a member of a group in which includes a company with called-up share capital or net assets of at least £5 million (but where the corporation has more than 20 shareholders or it is a subsidiary of a company with more than 20 shareholders, the £5 million share capital / net assets requirement is reduced to £500,000); (ii) a partnership or unincorporated association with net assets of at least £5 million and (iii) a trustee of a trust which has had gross assets (i.e. total assets held before deduction of any liabilities) of at least £10 million at any time within the year preceding the promotion.  Any investment opportunities mentioned in this GFM Website are available only to such persons, and persons of any other description in the UK may not rely on the information in it.  Most of the protections provided by the UK regulatory system, and compensation under the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme, will not be available.

GFM is established in the United Kingdom, which is a member state of the European Economic Area (the “EEA”).  Accordingly, this GFM Website is issued by GFM to the categories of persons described in the paragraph above that are both resident in and accessing this GFM Website from any member state of the EEA in reliance on its rights under the Directive on Electronic Commerce (2000/31/EC).  The member states of the EEA are:  Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

If you are not resident in an EEA member state or you are viewing this GFM Website in a country that is not an EEA member state, information displayed on this GFM Website contains material that may be interpreted by the relevant authorities in the country from which you are viewing the GFM Website as a financial promotion or an offer to purchase securities. Accordingly, the information on this GFM Website is only intended to be viewed by persons who fall outside the scope of any law that seeks to regulate financial promotions in your country of residence or in the country in which the GFM Website is being viewed. Examples of such persons may be governmental agencies, persons sufficiently experienced in investment business to appreciate the risks associated with investment services promoted on this GFM Website, large corporations and trusts and high net worth individuals. These examples are not country specific, may not be relevant to the country in which the GFM Website is being viewed and are provided for illustration purposes only. If you are uncertain about your position under the laws of your country of residence or the country in which the GFM Website is being viewed then you should consult your legal adviser.

Notice to Persons in the United States:

With respect to U.S. investors, investments in funds managed by GFM or a related entity are restricted to institutional investors who meet certain eligibility requirements.  Any potential investor should satisfy him or herself that an investment in any product of GFM or a related entity is permissible under the rules and regulations of his or her domicile.  This GFM Website is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where the publication or availability of this GFM Website is or would be prohibited.


The related entities of GFM include:

  • In the United Kingdom, Grosvenor Investment Management Limited, which is registered in England (Company Number 02774291) with its registered office at 70 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JP and which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
  • In the United States, Grosvenor Fund Management Inc., which is registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • In Japan, Grosvenor Fund Management Japan Limited provides financial services and products under its Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Kinsyo) License No 1956 issued by The Financial Services Agency, the Japanese Government and real estate investment advice as authorised under its Discretionary Real Estate Investment Advisory Business, License No. Sogo 63 issued by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. It is also authorised to transact real estate business under its Real Estate Transaction Business License No. Tokyo Governor (2) 87514 issued by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government.  

By clicking “I ACCEPT” below, you consent to the above Conditions and, in particular, you confirm that either:

(a)     you are resident in and accessing this GFM Website from one of the United Kingdom or another member state of the EEA and you qualify as an exempt category of person under the FPO (such as an Investment Professional or High Net Worth Business, as described under “LEGAL NOTICES” above); or

(b)    you fall outside the scope of any law that seeks to regulate financial promotions both in the country of your residence and in the country in which you are viewing this GFM Website, and therefore by accessing this GFM Website you will not contravene or cause Grosvenor to contravene any such law.